fret sensor version at1.03 Search Results


93
Addgene inc pdr-gw at1.03yemk
Pdr Gw At1.03yemk, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc07530325-37-3-16?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pdr-gw at1.03yemk - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific mitochondrially targeted at1.03 atp sensor
Mitochondrially Targeted At1.03 Atp Sensor, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc03346073-331-7-10?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrially targeted at1.03 atp sensor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific at1.03 r 122k/r126k
At1.03 R 122k/R126k, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc07530325-129-11-26?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
at1.03 r 122k/r126k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc wolf frommer
Wolf Frommer, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc07106129-0-20-22?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wolf frommer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc pdr gw at1 03r122k r126k
Pdr Gw At1 03r122k R126k, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pm28151554-55-4-36?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pdr gw at1 03r122k r126k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Santa Cruz Biotechnology sglt1 shrna
Figure 1. Upper Small Intestinal Glucose Sensing Regulates GP (A) Working hypothesis. (B) Experimental procedure and clamp protocol. (C–F) Graphs showing (C) the glucose infusion rate, (D) glucose production, (E) percent suppression ofclamp versus basal glucoseproduction, and(F)glucoseuptake in rats following upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), galactose (n = 6), fructose (n = 6), or sucralose (n = 6) during the pancreatic clamps. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, fructose and sucralose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2. 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; <t>SGLT1,</t> sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1; LV- SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA; Ex-9, exendin-9; and SRIF, somatostatin.
Sglt1 Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pm29056513-282-57-64?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sglt1 shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific fret sensor version at1.03
Figure 1. Upper Small Intestinal Glucose Sensing Regulates GP (A) Working hypothesis. (B) Experimental procedure and clamp protocol. (C–F) Graphs showing (C) the glucose infusion rate, (D) glucose production, (E) percent suppression ofclamp versus basal glucoseproduction, and(F)glucoseuptake in rats following upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), galactose (n = 6), fructose (n = 6), or sucralose (n = 6) during the pancreatic clamps. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, fructose and sucralose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2. 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; <t>SGLT1,</t> sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1; LV- SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA; Ex-9, exendin-9; and SRIF, somatostatin.
Fret Sensor Version At1.03, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc07794770-266-20-25?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fret sensor version at1.03 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific at3.10 mgk
Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.
At3.10 Mgk, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc06129245-163-4-0?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
at3.10 mgk - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific mutant (at1.03rk) signal
Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.
Mutant (At1.03rk) Signal, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc09881222-105-28-28?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mutant (at1.03rk) signal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
ATCC l tropica
Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.
L Tropica, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/gow_ineka__2023__multiplexed_real_time_pcrs_for_the_detection_and_differentiation_of_leishmania_utilising_bisulphite_conversion-2172-6-55?v=ATCC
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
l tropica - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific at1.03
Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.
At1.03, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pmc07646541-156-7-4?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
at1.03 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATeam Scientific fluorescent atp biosensor ateam at1.03l
Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.
Fluorescent Atp Biosensor Ateam At1.03l, supplied by ATeam Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fret+sensor+version+at1%2E03/pm30686527-340-21-38?v=ATeam+Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorescent atp biosensor ateam at1.03l - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 1. Upper Small Intestinal Glucose Sensing Regulates GP (A) Working hypothesis. (B) Experimental procedure and clamp protocol. (C–F) Graphs showing (C) the glucose infusion rate, (D) glucose production, (E) percent suppression ofclamp versus basal glucoseproduction, and(F)glucoseuptake in rats following upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), galactose (n = 6), fructose (n = 6), or sucralose (n = 6) during the pancreatic clamps. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, fructose and sucralose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2. 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1; LV- SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA; Ex-9, exendin-9; and SRIF, somatostatin.

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: Metformin Alters Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota that Impact a Glucose-SGLT1-Sensing Glucoregulatory Pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Upper Small Intestinal Glucose Sensing Regulates GP (A) Working hypothesis. (B) Experimental procedure and clamp protocol. (C–F) Graphs showing (C) the glucose infusion rate, (D) glucose production, (E) percent suppression ofclamp versus basal glucoseproduction, and(F)glucoseuptake in rats following upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), galactose (n = 6), fructose (n = 6), or sucralose (n = 6) during the pancreatic clamps. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, fructose and sucralose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2. 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1; LV- SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA; Ex-9, exendin-9; and SRIF, somatostatin.

Article Snippet: Briefly, 6 cm of the proximal intestine (between 6 and 12 cmdistal to the pyloric sphincter to target the same region of the upper small intestinal tract that is targeted by our reagent infusion protocol-see below) was isolated and ligated at both ends, flushed with saline until clean, and 0.2 mL of the lentivirus expressing mismatch or SGLT1 shRNA (both at 1.03 106 IFU) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was administered via a 23-gauge needle directly into the upper small intestinal lumen.

Techniques: Saline, shRNA

Figure 2. Role of SGLT1 in Glucose Sensing (A and B) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (A) and glucose production (B) during the clamp of rats that received upper small intestinal saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), phlorizin (n = 5), glucose and phlorizin (n = 8), 3-OMG (n = 7), and 3-OMG and phlorizin (n = 6). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, phlorizin, glucose and phlorizin, and 3-OMG and phlorizin, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (C) Quantitative analysis (top; n = 5 [LV-MM]; n = 5 [LV-SGLT1 shRNA]) and representative western blot (bottom) of SGLT1 protein expression in the upper small intestinal mucosa of rats infected with LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA after the clamp with a saline infusion. Data represents the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (D and E) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (D) and glucose production (E) of rats infected with upper small intestinal LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA that received upper small intestinal saline (n = 5, 5) or glucose (n = 6, 6) during the clamp. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.01 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S2 and Table S2. SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: Metformin Alters Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota that Impact a Glucose-SGLT1-Sensing Glucoregulatory Pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Role of SGLT1 in Glucose Sensing (A and B) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (A) and glucose production (B) during the clamp of rats that received upper small intestinal saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), phlorizin (n = 5), glucose and phlorizin (n = 8), 3-OMG (n = 7), and 3-OMG and phlorizin (n = 6). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, phlorizin, glucose and phlorizin, and 3-OMG and phlorizin, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (C) Quantitative analysis (top; n = 5 [LV-MM]; n = 5 [LV-SGLT1 shRNA]) and representative western blot (bottom) of SGLT1 protein expression in the upper small intestinal mucosa of rats infected with LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA after the clamp with a saline infusion. Data represents the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (D and E) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (D) and glucose production (E) of rats infected with upper small intestinal LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA that received upper small intestinal saline (n = 5, 5) or glucose (n = 6, 6) during the clamp. Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.01 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S2 and Table S2. SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; 3-OMG, 3-O-methyl glucose; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Article Snippet: Briefly, 6 cm of the proximal intestine (between 6 and 12 cmdistal to the pyloric sphincter to target the same region of the upper small intestinal tract that is targeted by our reagent infusion protocol-see below) was isolated and ligated at both ends, flushed with saline until clean, and 0.2 mL of the lentivirus expressing mismatch or SGLT1 shRNA (both at 1.03 106 IFU) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was administered via a 23-gauge needle directly into the upper small intestinal lumen.

Techniques: Saline, shRNA, Western Blot, Expressing, Infection

Figure 3. Role of GLP-1 in Glucose Sensing (A and B) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (A) and glucose production (B) during the clamp of rats that received upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), MK-329 (n = 6), glucose and MK-329 (n = 6), Exendin-9 (n = 5), or glucose and Exendin-9 (n = 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, MK-329, Exendin-9, and Exendin-9 and glucose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (C and D) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (C) and glucose production (D) during the clamp of RC or 3-day HFD-fed rats that received saline (n = 7, 7) or glucose (n = 9, 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.01 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (E) Portal active GLP-1 levels immediately following the clamps in RC- and HFD-fed rats that received an upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 6, 6) or glucose (n = 6, 6). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (F) Upper small intestinal mucosal mRNA expression of SGLT1 in untreated rats fed RC (n = 6) or HFD (n = 6) and HFD rats pretreated 1 day prior with metformin (n = 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S3. Regular chow (RC); high-fat diet (HFD); high-fat diet with metformin pretreatment (HFD + MET).

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: Metformin Alters Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota that Impact a Glucose-SGLT1-Sensing Glucoregulatory Pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Role of GLP-1 in Glucose Sensing (A and B) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (A) and glucose production (B) during the clamp of rats that received upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 7), glucose (n = 9), MK-329 (n = 6), glucose and MK-329 (n = 6), Exendin-9 (n = 5), or glucose and Exendin-9 (n = 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus saline, MK-329, Exendin-9, and Exendin-9 and glucose, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (C and D) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (C) and glucose production (D) during the clamp of RC or 3-day HFD-fed rats that received saline (n = 7, 7) or glucose (n = 9, 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.01 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (E) Portal active GLP-1 levels immediately following the clamps in RC- and HFD-fed rats that received an upper small intestinal infusion of saline (n = 6, 6) or glucose (n = 6, 6). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (F) Upper small intestinal mucosal mRNA expression of SGLT1 in untreated rats fed RC (n = 6) or HFD (n = 6) and HFD rats pretreated 1 day prior with metformin (n = 5). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05 versus all other groups, as assessed by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. See also Figure S3. Regular chow (RC); high-fat diet (HFD); high-fat diet with metformin pretreatment (HFD + MET).

Article Snippet: Briefly, 6 cm of the proximal intestine (between 6 and 12 cmdistal to the pyloric sphincter to target the same region of the upper small intestinal tract that is targeted by our reagent infusion protocol-see below) was isolated and ligated at both ends, flushed with saline until clean, and 0.2 mL of the lentivirus expressing mismatch or SGLT1 shRNA (both at 1.03 106 IFU) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was administered via a 23-gauge needle directly into the upper small intestinal lumen.

Techniques: Saline, Expressing

Figure 4. Metformin Pretreatment Restores Glucose Sensing via SGLT1 (A) Experimental outline. (B and C) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (B) and glucose production (C) of HFD rats pretreated with saline or metformin (1 day prior) that received upper small intestinal saline or glucose. Saline-pretreated rats with saline infusion (n = 6), saline-pretreated rats with glucose infusion (n = 6), metformin-pretreated rats with saline infusion (n = 6), and metformin-pretreated rats with glucose infusion (n = 9). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus metformin-pretreated rats with saline infusion, as assessed by t-test. (D) The mRNA expression of SGLT1 in the upper small intestinal mucosa of LV-MM (n = 5) or LV-SGLT1 shRNA (n = 5) rats that received metformin pretreatment and an upper small intestinal glucose infusion during the clamp. Data represents the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (E and F) Graphs showing the (E) glucose infusion rate and (F) glucose production of HFD rats injected with LV-MM (n = 5) or LV-SGLT1 shRNA (n = 7) that received metformin pretreatment and upper small intestinal glucose infusion during the clamp. Data represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S4. USI, upper small intestine; LV, lentivirus; HFD, high-fat diet; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; and LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: Metformin Alters Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota that Impact a Glucose-SGLT1-Sensing Glucoregulatory Pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Metformin Pretreatment Restores Glucose Sensing via SGLT1 (A) Experimental outline. (B and C) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (B) and glucose production (C) of HFD rats pretreated with saline or metformin (1 day prior) that received upper small intestinal saline or glucose. Saline-pretreated rats with saline infusion (n = 6), saline-pretreated rats with glucose infusion (n = 6), metformin-pretreated rats with saline infusion (n = 6), and metformin-pretreated rats with glucose infusion (n = 9). Data in all graphs represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus metformin-pretreated rats with saline infusion, as assessed by t-test. (D) The mRNA expression of SGLT1 in the upper small intestinal mucosa of LV-MM (n = 5) or LV-SGLT1 shRNA (n = 5) rats that received metformin pretreatment and an upper small intestinal glucose infusion during the clamp. Data represents the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (E and F) Graphs showing the (E) glucose infusion rate and (F) glucose production of HFD rats injected with LV-MM (n = 5) or LV-SGLT1 shRNA (n = 7) that received metformin pretreatment and upper small intestinal glucose infusion during the clamp. Data represent the mean + SEM; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S4. USI, upper small intestine; LV, lentivirus; HFD, high-fat diet; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; and LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Article Snippet: Briefly, 6 cm of the proximal intestine (between 6 and 12 cmdistal to the pyloric sphincter to target the same region of the upper small intestinal tract that is targeted by our reagent infusion protocol-see below) was isolated and ligated at both ends, flushed with saline until clean, and 0.2 mL of the lentivirus expressing mismatch or SGLT1 shRNA (both at 1.03 106 IFU) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was administered via a 23-gauge needle directly into the upper small intestinal lumen.

Techniques: Saline, Expressing, shRNA, Injection

Figure 6. Transplant of Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota from Metformin-Treated Rats Restores Glucose Sensing via SGLT1 (A and B) Working hypothesis (A) and experimental outline (B) of microbiota transplant. (C and D) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (C) and glucose production (D) of HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated upper small in- testinal microbiota and given a saline or glucose upper small intestinal infusion during the clamp (1 day following the microbiota transfer). Saline-infused rats receiving saline-treated microbiota (n = 6), glucose-infused rats receiving saline-treated microbiota (n = 6), saline-infused rats receiving metformin-treated microbiota (n = 6), and glucose-infused rats receiving metformin-treated microbiota (n = 10). Data represent the mean + SEM; ***p< 0.001 versus HFD rats transplanted with metformin-treated upper small intestinal microbiota and given a saline upper small intestinal infusion, as assessed by t-test. (E) Portal active GLP-1 levels immediately following the clamps in HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated upper small intestinal microbiota and given a glucose upper small intestinal infusion during the clamp (n = 6 and 7, respectively). Data represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (F) The mRNA expression of SGLT1 in the upper small intestinal mucosa of HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated microbiota following the clamp (n = 6). Data represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (G) Glucose production of HFD rats injected with LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA that were subsequently transplanted with metformin-treated microbiota and given a glucose upper small intestinal infusion (n = 6 and 7, respectively). Data represent the mean + SEM; **p < 0.01. See also Figure S6. USI, upper small intestine; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor; LV, lentivirus; HFD, high-fat diet; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: Metformin Alters Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota that Impact a Glucose-SGLT1-Sensing Glucoregulatory Pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Transplant of Upper Small Intestinal Microbiota from Metformin-Treated Rats Restores Glucose Sensing via SGLT1 (A and B) Working hypothesis (A) and experimental outline (B) of microbiota transplant. (C and D) Graphs showing the glucose infusion rate (C) and glucose production (D) of HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated upper small in- testinal microbiota and given a saline or glucose upper small intestinal infusion during the clamp (1 day following the microbiota transfer). Saline-infused rats receiving saline-treated microbiota (n = 6), glucose-infused rats receiving saline-treated microbiota (n = 6), saline-infused rats receiving metformin-treated microbiota (n = 6), and glucose-infused rats receiving metformin-treated microbiota (n = 10). Data represent the mean + SEM; ***p< 0.001 versus HFD rats transplanted with metformin-treated upper small intestinal microbiota and given a saline upper small intestinal infusion, as assessed by t-test. (E) Portal active GLP-1 levels immediately following the clamps in HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated upper small intestinal microbiota and given a glucose upper small intestinal infusion during the clamp (n = 6 and 7, respectively). Data represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (F) The mRNA expression of SGLT1 in the upper small intestinal mucosa of HFD rats transplanted with saline- or metformin-treated microbiota following the clamp (n = 6). Data represent the mean + SEM; *p < 0.05. (G) Glucose production of HFD rats injected with LV-MM or LV-SGLT1 shRNA that were subsequently transplanted with metformin-treated microbiota and given a glucose upper small intestinal infusion (n = 6 and 7, respectively). Data represent the mean + SEM; **p < 0.01. See also Figure S6. USI, upper small intestine; SGLT1, sodium glucose co-transporter 1; GLP-1R, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor; LV, lentivirus; HFD, high-fat diet; LV-MM, lentiviral mismatch; LV-SGLT1 shRNA, lentiviral SGLT1 shRNA.

Article Snippet: Briefly, 6 cm of the proximal intestine (between 6 and 12 cmdistal to the pyloric sphincter to target the same region of the upper small intestinal tract that is targeted by our reagent infusion protocol-see below) was isolated and ligated at both ends, flushed with saline until clean, and 0.2 mL of the lentivirus expressing mismatch or SGLT1 shRNA (both at 1.03 106 IFU) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was administered via a 23-gauge needle directly into the upper small intestinal lumen.

Techniques: Saline, Expressing, Injection, shRNA

Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.

Journal: Neuroscience Bulletin

Article Title: Spatiotemporal Imaging of Cellular Energy Metabolism with Genetically-Encoded Fluorescent Sensors in Brain

doi: 10.1007/s12264-018-0229-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fluorescence properties of genetically encoded metabolite sensors.

Article Snippet: ATeam has four variants (AT3.10, AT3.10 MGK , AT1.03 YEMK , and AT1.03), whose K d for ATP ranges from 7.4 μmol/L to 3.3 mmol/L [ 38 ] (Table ).

Techniques: Fluorescence, Binding Assay